Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; June 2008; v. 72; no. 3; p. 703-730; DOI: 10.1180/minmag.2008.072.3.703
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The crystal chemistry of the gedrite-group amphiboles. I. Crystal structure and site populations

M. Schindler1, E. Sokolova1, Y. Abdu1, F. C. Hawthorne1,*, B. W. Evans2 and K. Ishida3

1 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
2 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351310, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
3 Department of Evolution of Earth Environments, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University, 4-2-1 Ropponmatsu, Chu-ku, Fukuoko 810-8560, Japan

* E-mail: frank_hawthorne{at}umanitoba.ca

The crystal structures of twenty-five orthorhombic Fe-Mg-Mn amphiboles, a = 18.525–18.620, b = 17.806–18.034, c = 5.264–5.303 Å, V = 1737.6–1776.7, space group = Pnma, Z = 4, have been refined to R indices in the range 2.1–7.8% using 790–1804 unique observed reflections measured with Mo-K{alpha} X-radiation on a Bruker P4 automated four-circle diffractometer equipped with a 1K CCD detector. The quality of the refinements is strongly a function of the [4]Al content of the crystals because of unmixing in the central part of the series due to the presence of a low-temperature solvus. The amphibole crystals were analysed by electron microprobe subsequent to collection of the X-ray intensity data and span the anthophyllite–gedrite series from 0.17–1.82 [4]Al a.p.f.u. Mössbauer spectroscopy shows that the amphiboles of this series commonly contain small but significant amounts of Fe3+. The amount of [4]Al is linearly related to the grand <T–O> distance by the equation <T–O> = 1.6214 + 0.171 [4]Al, R = 0.980; the slope of this relation is not significantly different from that characteristic of a hard-sphere model. The <T–O> distances indicate the following site preference for [4]Al: T1B > T2B > T1A >> T2A. The <M2–O> distances are compatible with all [6]Al and Fe3+ ordered at the M2 site. The grand <M1,2,3–O> distance is related to the mean radius of the constituent cations, <rM1,2,3>, by the equation <<M1,2,3–O>> = 1.4684 + 0.8553(7) <rM1,2,3>.

KEYWORDS: anthophyllite, gedrite, orthorhombic amphibole, crystal-structure refinement, electron-microprobe analysis, Mössbauer spectroscopy, site populations




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
F. C. Hawthorne, M. Schindler, Y. Abdu, E. Sokolova, B. W. Evans, and K. Ishida
The crystal chemistry of the gedrite-group amphiboles. II. Stereochemistry and chemical relations
Mineralogical Magazine, June 1, 2008; 72(3): 731 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland