Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; June 2007; v. 71; no. 3; p. 285-320; DOI: 10.1180/minmag.2007.071.3.285
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tischendorf, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rieder, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

True and brittle micas: composition and solid-solution series

G. Tischendorf1, H.-J. Förster2,*, B. Gottesmann3 and M. Rieder4

1 Bautzner Strasse 16, D-02763 Zittau, Germany
2 Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Potsdam, P.O. Box 601553, D-14415 Potsdam, Germany
3 GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
4 Institute of Materials Chemistry, TU Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15/2172, CZ-708 33 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

* E-mail: forhj{at}gfz-potsdam.de

Micas incorporate a wide variety of elements in their crystal structures. Elements occurring in significant concentrations in micas include: Si, IVAl, IVFe3+, B and Be in the tetrahedral sheet; Ti, VIAl, VIFe3+, Mn3+, Cr, V, Fe2+, Mn2+, Mg and Li in the octahedral sheet; K, Na, Rb, Cs, NH4, Ca and Ba in the interlayer; and O, OH, F, Cl and S as anions. Extensive substitutions within these groups of elements form compositionally varied micas as members of different solid-solution series. The most common true K micas (94% of almost 6750 mica analyses) belong to three dominant solid-solution series (phlogopite–annite, siderophyllite–polylithionite and muscovite–celadonite). Their classification parameters include: Mg/(Mg+Fetot) [=Mg#] for micas with VIR >2.5 a.p.f.u. and VIAl <0.5 a.p.f.u.; Fetot/(Fetot+Li) [=Fe#] for micas with VIR >2.5 a.p.f.u. and VIAl >0.5 a.p.f.u.; and VIAl/(VI Al+Fetot+Mg) [=Al#] for micas with VIR <2.5 a.p.f.u. The common true K micas plot predominantly within and between these series and have MgxLi <0.3 a.p.f.u. Tainiolite is a mica with MgxLi >0.7 a.p.f.u., or, for transitional stages, 0.3–0.7 a.p.f.u. Some true K mica end-members, especially phlogopite, annite and muscovite, form binary solid solutions with non-K true micas and with brittle micas (6% of the micas studied). Graphical presentation of true K micas using the coordinates Mg minus Li (= mgli) and VIFetot+Mn+Ti minus VIAl (= feal) depends on their classification according to VIR and VIAl, complemented with the 50/50 rule.

KEYWORDS: true micas, brittle micas, classification, solid-solution series, composition







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland