Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; August 2006; v. 70; no. 4; p. 373-382; DOI: 10.1180/0026461067040342
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nolze, G.
Right arrow Articles by Geist, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Orientation relationships of carlsbergite in schreibersite and kamacite in the north Chile iron meteorite

G. Nolze1,*, G. Wagner2, R. Saliwan Neumann1, R. Skála3 and V. Geist2

1 Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany
2 Institute for Mineralogy, Crystallography and Materials Science, University of Leipzig, Scharnhorststrasse 20, 04275 Leipzig, Germany
3 Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojová 135, CZ-16502 Prague, Czech Republic

* E-mail: gert.nolze{at}bam.de

The crystallographic orientation of carlsbergite (CrN) in the north Chile meteorite (hexahedrite) was investigated using electron backscatter diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. These studies examined the CrN crystals in the rhabdites (idiomorphic schreibersite) and in kamacite. It was found that the CrN crystals embedded in rhabdite show a number of different orientation relationships with the host crystals. These orientations can be explained based on the lattice dimensions of both coexisting crystalline materials. It was also found that both carlsbergite and kamacite are characterized by a high dislocation density (>=109 cm–2) while rhabdite is free of dislocations. It is supposed that in spite of the deformed metallic matrix, a general connection between the orientation relation of all the phases involved exists.

KEYWORDS: EBSD, phosphides, carlsbergite, orientation relationship, iron meteorites







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland