Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; October 2005; v. 69; no. 5; p. 769-780; DOI: 10.1180/0026461056950287
© 2005 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sneddon, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Valsami-Jones, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An investigation into arsenic(V) removal from aqueous solutions by hydroxylapatite and bone-char

I. R. Sneddon1,{dagger}, H. Garelick1,* and E. Valsami-Jones2

1 School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 4SA, UK
2 Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK

* E-mail: h.garelick{at}mdx.ac.uk

Arsenic(V) removal from aqueous solution following addition of either a mixture of synthetic hydroxylapatite and baryte or bone-char is discussed. Arsenic concentrations of 4, 10 and 100 mg/l were investigated and additions of 0.2–10 g/l of solid (hydroxylapatite, baryte or bone-char) were tested, at an initial pH of either 5 or 7. Although the mixture of hydroxylapatite and baryte had a small influence on arsenic concentrations, bone-char was found to be a very effective sorbing agent for arsenic(V). Packed-column studies to investigate the bone-char capacity, followed by leaching tests were carried out. The capacity of bone-char was found to be superior to that of granular activated carbon. The experiments presented here indicate that the mechanism involved is adsorption rather than co-precipitation.

KEYWORDS: arsenic, bone-char, hydroxylapatite, baryte, granular activated carbon, adsorption, remediation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
E. Valsami-Jones, D. A. Polya, and K. Hudson-Edwards
Environmental mineralogy, geochemistry and human health
Mineralogical Magazine, October 1, 2005; 69(5): 615 - 620.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland