|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

1 School of Health and Social Sciences, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 4SA, UK
2 Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
* E-mail: h.garelick{at}mdx.ac.uk
Arsenic(V) removal from aqueous solution following addition of either a mixture of synthetic hydroxylapatite and baryte or bone-char is discussed. Arsenic concentrations of 4, 10 and 100 mg/l were investigated and additions of 0.210 g/l of solid (hydroxylapatite, baryte or bone-char) were tested, at an initial pH of either 5 or 7. Although the mixture of hydroxylapatite and baryte had a small influence on arsenic concentrations, bone-char was found to be a very effective sorbing agent for arsenic(V). Packed-column studies to investigate the bone-char capacity, followed by leaching tests were carried out. The capacity of bone-char was found to be superior to that of granular activated carbon. The experiments presented here indicate that the mechanism involved is adsorption rather than co-precipitation.
KEYWORDS: arsenic, bone-char, hydroxylapatite, baryte, granular activated carbon, adsorption, remediation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Valsami-Jones, D. A. Polya, and K. Hudson-Edwards Environmental mineralogy, geochemistry and human health Mineralogical Magazine, October 1, 2005; 69(5): 615 - 620. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |