Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bagci, U. Articles by Höck, V. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Whole-rock and mineral chemistry of cumulates from the Kzlda (Hatay) ophiolite (Turkey): clues for multiple magma generation during crustal accretion in the southern Neotethyan ocean

U. Baci^1,2, O. Parlak^2,* and V. Höck³

¹ Mersin Üniversitesi, Jeoloji Mühendislii Bölümü, 33342 Çiftlikköy-Mersin, Turkey
² Çukurova Üniversitesi, Jeoloji Mühendislii Bölümü, 01330 Balcal-Adana, Turkey
³ University of Salzburg, Department of Geology & Paleontology, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria

^* E-mail: parlak{at}cukurova.edu.tr

The late Cretaceous Kzlda ophiolite forms one of the best exposures of oceanic lithospheric remnants of southern Neotethys to the north of the Arabian promontory in Turkey. The ultramafic to mafic cumulate rocks, displaying variable thickness (ranging from 165 to 700 m), are ductiley deformed, possibly in response to syn-magmatic extension during seafloor spreading and characterized by wehrlite, olivine gabbro, olivine gabbronorite and gabbro. The gabbroic cumulates have an intrusive contact with the wehrlitic cumulates in some places. The crystallization order of the cumulus and intercumulus phases is olivine (Fo_86–77)±chromian spinel, clinopyroxene (Mg#_92–76), plagioclase(An_95–83), orthopyroxene(Mg#_87–79). The olivine, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene and plagioclase in ultramafic and mafic cumulate rocks seem to have similar compositional range. This suggests that these rocks cannot represent a simple crystal line of descent. Instead the overlapping ranges in mineral compositions in different rock types suggest multiple magma generation during crustal accretion for the Kzlda ophiolite. The presence of high Mg# of olivine, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene, and the absence of Ca-rich plagioclase as an early fractionating phase co-precipitating with forsteritic olivine, suggest that the Kzlda plutonic suite is not likely to have originated in a mid-ocean ridge environment. Instead the whole-rock and mineral chemistry of the cumulates indicates their derivation from an island arc tholeiitic (IAT) magma. All the evidence indicates that the Kzlda ophiolite formed along a slow-spreading centre in a fore-arc region of a suprasubduction zone tectonic setting.

KEYWORDS: suprasubduction, forearc, Neotethys, Turkey, cumulate

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. Garfunkel Neotethyan ophiolites: formation and obduction within the life cycle of the host basins Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 260(1): 301 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]