Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tischendorf, G. Articles by Guidotti, Ch. V. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A new graphical presentation and subdivision of potassium micas

¹ Bautzner Straße 16, D-02763 Zittau, Germany
² Department of Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Mineral Resources, Charles University, Albertov 6, CZ-12843 Praha 2, Czech Republic
³ Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Potsdam, P.O. Box 601553, D-14415 Potsdam, Germany
⁴ GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
⁵ Department of Geological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5790, USA

^* E-mail: for{at}geo.uni-potsdam.de

A system based on variation of the octahedrally coordinated cations is proposed for graphical presentation and subdivision of tri- and dioctahedral K micas, which makes use of elemental differences (in a.p.f.u.): (Mg –Li) [= mgli] and (Fe_tot + Mn + Ti –^VIAl) [= feal]. All common true tri- and dioctahedral K micas are shown in a single polygon outlined by seven main compositional points forming its vertices. Sequentially clockwise, starting from Mg₃ (phlogopite), these points are: Mg_2.5Al_0.5, Al_{2.167 0.833}, Al_1.75Li_1.25, Li₂Al (polylithionite), Fe₂²⁺ Li, and Fe₃²⁺ (annite). Trilithionite (Li_1.5Al_1.5), Li_1.5Fe²⁺ Al_0.5, Fe₂²⁺Mg, and Mg₂Fe²⁺ are also located on the perimeter of the polygon. IMA-siderophyllite (Fe²⁺₂Al) and muscovite (Al₂) plot inside.

The classification conforms with the IMA-approved mica nomenclature and differentiates among the following mica species according to their position in a diagram consisting of mgli and feal axes plotted orthogonally; trioctahedral: phlogopite, biotite, siderophyllite, annite, zinnwaldite, lepidolite and tainiolite; dioctahedral: muscovite, phengite and celadonite. Potassium micas with [Si] <2.5 a.p.f.u. including IMA-siderophyllite, KFe₂²⁺AlAl₂Si₂O₁₀(OH)₂, and IMA-eastonite, KMg₂AlAl₂Si₂O₁₀(OH)₂ seem not to form in nature.

The proposed subdivision has several advantages. All common true, trioctahedral and dioctahedral K micas, whether Li-bearing or Li-free, are shown within one diagram, which is easy to use and gives every mica composition an unambiguously defined name. Mica analyses with Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, Fe²⁺ + Fe³⁺, or Fe_tot can be considered, which is particularly valuable for microprobe analyses. It facilitates easy reconstruction of evolutionary pathways of mica compositions during crystallization, a feature having key importance in petrologically oriented research. Equally important, the subdivision has great potential for understanding many of the crystal-chemistry features of the K micas. In turn this may allow one to recognize and discriminate the extent to which crystal chemistry or bulk composition controls the occurrence of some seemingly possible or hypothetical K mica.

KEYWORDS: K micas, trioctahedral, dioctahedral, celadonite, classification

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.F. Brigatti, C.V. Guidotti, D. Malferrari, and F.P. Sassi Single-crystal X-ray studies of trioctahedral micas coexisting with dioctahedral micas in metamorphic sequences from western Maine American Mineralogist, February 1, 2008; 93(2-3): 396 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Brigatti, A. Mottana, D. Malferrari, and G. Cibin Crystal structure and chemical composition of Li-, Fe-, and Mn-rich micas American Mineralogist, August 1, 2007; 92(8-9): 1395 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Tischendorf, H.-J. Forster, B. Gottesmann, and M. Rieder True and brittle micas: composition and solid-solution series Mineralogical Magazine, June 1, 2007; 71(3): 285 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Roda, P. Keller, A. Pesquera, and F. Fontan Micas of the muscovite - lepidolite series from Karibib pegmatites, Namibia Mineralogical Magazine, February 1, 2007; 71(1): 41 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. RODA-ROBLES, A. PESQUERA, P. P. GIL-CRESPO, J. TORRES-RUIZ, and P. DE PARSEVAL Mineralogy and geochemistry of micas from the Pinilla de Fermoselle pegmatite (Zamora, Spain) European Journal of Mineralogy, June 1, 2006; 18(3): 369 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. KISCH, R. SASSI, and F. P. SASSI The b0 lattice parameter and chemistry of phengites from HP/LT metapelites European Journal of Mineralogy, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 207 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. ZIEMANN, H.-J. FORSTER, D. E. HARLOV, and D. FREI Origin of fluorapatite-monazite assemblages in a metamorphosed, sillimanite-bearing pegmatoid, Reinbolt Hills, East Antarctica European Journal of Mineralogy, August 1, 2005; 17(4): 567 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]