Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; April 2003; v. 67; no. 2; p. 219-231; DOI: 10.1180/0026461036720096
© 2003 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langmi, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evaluation of computer-controlled SEM in the study of metal-contaminated soils

H. W. Langmi1,*,{dagger} and J. Watt2

1 Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2BP, UK
2 Middlesex University, Bounds Green Road, London N11, UK

* E-mail: HWL037{at}bham.ac.uk

Computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy (CCSEM) has been assessed for the determination of form and size distribution of heavy metals in urban contaminated soils. Metal distributions within individual particles were determined using X-ray element mapping. The sites selected for study were (1) around a landfill site, previously a colliery in Wolverhampton, UK and (2) a private garden adjacent to a railway in Nottingham, UK. Backscattered thresholding techniques were used to isolate the Pb-containing categories. The classification results for both Wolverhampton and Nottingham soils were generally similar but more Pb-containing classes were observed for the Nottingham samples when a comparison was made between results of the same size fractions. However, difficulties with the technique arose when particles showing chemically similar weathering crusts were assigned to the same class, despite having different internal compositions. The CCSEM data therefore need to be interpreted with caution and their application limited to situations in which particle internal complexity is not an issue.

KEYWORDS: CCSEM, Pb-contamination, soil, Nottingham, Wolverhampton, UK




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
K. Pye
Forensic examination of rocks, sediments, soils and dusts using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray chemical microanalysis
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 232(1): 103 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland