Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; February 2003; v. 67; no. 1; p. 31-46; DOI: 10.1180/0026461036710082
© 2003 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berlepsch, P.
Right arrow Articles by Graeser, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Tripuhyite, FeSbO4, revisited

P. Berlepsch1,*, T. Armbruster1, J. Brugger2, A. J. Criddle3 and S. Graeser4

1 Laboratorium für chemische und mineralogische Kristallographie, Universität Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
2 The South Australian Museum & Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, 5000 Adelaide, South Australia
3 Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
4 Mineralogisch-Petrographisches Institut, Universität Basel, Bernoullistrasse 30, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland

* E-mail: peter.berlepsch{at}krist.unibe.ch

The exact nature of tripuhyite remains controversial more than 100 years after the first description of the mineral. Different stoichiometries and crystal structures (rutile or tri-rutile types) have been suggested for this Fe-Sb-oxide. To address these uncertainties, we studied tripuhyite from Tripuhy, Minas Gerais, Brazil (type material) and Falotta, Grisons, Switzerland using single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy and electron microprobe analysis.

Electron microprobe analyses showed the Fe/Sb ratios to be close to one in tripuhyite from both localities. Single crystal XRD studies revealed that tripuhyite from the type locality and from Falotta have the rutile structure (P42/mnm, a = 4.625(4) c = 3.059(5) and a = 4.6433(10) c = 3.0815(9) Å , respectively). Despite careful examination, no evidence for a tripled c parameter, characteristic of the tri-rutile structure, was found and hence the structure was refined with the rutile model and complete Fe-Sb disorder over the cationic sites in both cases (type material: R1 = 3.61%; Falotta material: R1 = 3.96%). The specular reflectance values of type material tripuhyite and lewisite were measured and the following refractive indices calculated (after Koenigsberger): tripuhyite nmin = 2.14, nmax = 2.27; lewisite (cubic) n = 2.04.

These results, together with those of 57Fe and 121Sb Mössbauer spectroscopy on natural and synthetic tripuhyites reported in the literature, indicate that the chemical formula of tripuhyite is Fe3+Sb5+O4 (FeSbO4). Thus, tripuhyite can no longer be attributed to the tapiolite group of minerals of general type AB2O6. A comparison of the results presented with the mineralogical data of squawcreekite suggests that tripuhyite and squawcreekite are identical. In consequence, tripuhyite was redefined as Fe3+Sb5+O4 with a rutile-type structure. Both the proposed new formula and unit cell (rutile-type) of tripuhyite as well as the discreditation of squawcreekite have been approved by the Commission on New Mineral and Mineral Names (CNMMN) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA).

KEYWORDS: tripuhyite, squawcreekite, lewisite, structure refinements, ore microscopy, electron microprobe analyses




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
C. J. Stanley, G. C. Jones, M. S. Rumsey, C. Blake, A. C. Roberts, J. A.R. Stirling, G. J.C. Carpenter, P. S. Whitfield, J. D. Grice, and Y. Lepage
Jadarite, LiNaSiB3O7(OH), a new mineral species from the Jadar Basin, Serbia
European Journal of Mineralogy, July 1, 2007; 19(4): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
L. B. Railsback
Patterns in the compositions of oxysalt and sulfosalt minerals, and the paradoxical nature of quartz
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2007; 92(2-3): 356 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
A. G. Christy and K. Gatedal
Extremely Pb-rich rock-forming silicates including a beryllian scapolite and associated minerals in a skarn from Langban, Varmland, Sweden
Mineralogical Magazine, December 1, 2005; 69(6): 995 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
M. Novak, P. Cerny, J. Cempirek, V. Srein, and J. Filip
FERROTAPIOLITE AS A PSEUDOMORPH OF STIBIOTANTALITE FROM THE LASTOVICKY LEPIDOLITE PEGMATITE, CZECH REPUBLIC; AN EXAMPLE OF HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION AT CONSTANT Ta/(Ta + Nb)
Can Mineral, August 1, 2004; 42(4): 1117 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
C. J. Stanley, C. J. Stanley, and D. J. Vaughan
ALAN J. CRIDDLE DSc 1944-2002: Memorial Notice
Mineralogical Magazine, April 1, 2004; 68(2): 223 - 229.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland