Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; October 2001; v. 65; no. 5; p. 621-633
© 2001 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glasser, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mineralogical aspects of cement in radioactive waste disposal

F. P. Glasser*

Chemistry Department, University of Aberdeen, 033 Meston Building, Meston Walk, Old Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK

* E-mail: f.p.glasser{at}abdn.ac.uk

Some of the physical, chemical and mineralogical characteristics of Portland cement and related materials relevant to nuclear waste immobilization are defined. The ability to condition and maintain a high aqueous pH is undoubtedly the most important factor: it precipitates many species as hydrous oxides or hydroxides. However, in the longer term, many species – cationic as well as anionic – react with one or more cement components forming solubility-limiting phases. Progress on characterization of these phases is outlined. Many of the host phases have natural equivalents and this gives comfort in respect of their likely persistence over geological time. The emerging picture of immobilization in cement suggests that cement compositions can be tailored in terms of pH, Eh and internal chemistry so as to maximize immobilization potential. Nickel, uranium and chromium and chloride are used as examples.

KEYWORDS: Portland cement, cement mineralogy, nickel, uranium, chromium, chloride




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
C. A. Rochelle, I. Czernichowski-Lauriol, and A. E. Milodowski
The impact of chemical reactions on CO2 storage in geological formations: a brief review
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 233(1): 87 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
D. Savage, C. Rochelle, Y. Moore, A. Milodowski, K. Bateman, D. Bailey, and M. Mihara
Analcime reactions at 25-90{degrees}C in hyperalkaline fluids
Mineralogical Magazine, October 1, 2001; 65(5): 571 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
M. E. Hodson and A. Bloodworth
The mineralogy of waste and waste disposal
Mineralogical Magazine, October 1, 2001; 65(5): 561 - 562.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland