Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bailey, D. K. Articles by Collier, J. D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Carbonatite-melilitite association in the Italian collision zone and the Ugandan rifted craton: significant common factors

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK

^* E-mail: ken.bailey{at}bris.ac.uk

Italian carbonatites form part of a suite with melilitites, normally an association characteristic of continental interiors; the perfect analogue of the Italian suite being the kamafugites (from the type area in SW Uganda, where the western branch of the East African Rift Zone cuts across the craton). The latter are commonly attributed to plume generation, whereas the Italian carbonatites, strung along the Appennine front, are usually linked to subduction. Evidently these two mechanisms are not essential, since neither can apply in both provinces. This conclusion is re-inforced by the related magmatism registered in both provinces in the Cretaceous. Phlogopite is ubiquitous in the mantle debris, and compositions from the two provinces overlap. Xenolithic phlogopites are distinct from cognate micas in the lavas, and from the carrier melt compositions, with similar distribution patterns in both suites. Kamafugitic magmas must be products of exceptional conditions, and added to the many near-identical magmatic features, the Italian and Ugandan volcanoes have sampled similar mantle conditions. Although the large scale geodynamic regimes are in total contrast, as are the deep mantle tomographic structures, the crucial common factor at the igneous province level is extensional tectonics. Extension, promoting release of volatiles (esp. CO₂), is the vital trigger for this small volume, primary magmatism.

KEYWORDS: carbonatite, melilitite, mantle phlogopite, lithosphere extension, tomography, kimberlite

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Bailey, M. Garson, S. Kearns, and A. P. Velasco Carbonate volcanism in Calatrava, central Spain: a report on the initial findings Mineralogical Magazine, December 1, 2005; 69(6): 907 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Stoppa, G. Rosatelli, A. Cundari, F. Castorina, and A. R. Woolley COMMENT ON MELLUSO ET AL. (2003): Reported data and interpretation of some wollastonite- and melilite-bearing rocks from the Central Apennines of Italy American Mineralogist, November 1, 2005; 90(11-12): 1919 - 1925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Jones, A.P. Jones, and K.T. Pickering Evidence for aqueous fluid-sediment transport and erosional processes on Venus Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2003; 160(2): 319 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Stoppa, A. R. Woolley, and A. Cundari Extension of the melilite-carbonatite province in the Apennines of Italy: the kamafugite of Grotta del Cervo, Abruzzo Mineralogical Magazine, August 1, 2002; 66(4): 555 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Lavecchia and P. Boncio Tectonic setting of the carbonatite-melilitite association of Italy Mineralogical Magazine, August 1, 2000; 64(4): 583 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Jones Carbonatite Thematic Set Mineralogical Magazine, August 1, 2000; 64(4): 581 - 582. [Full Text] [PDF]