Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; February 2000; v. 64; no. 1; p. 59-83
© 2000 Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitzsimons, I. C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

SIMS stable isotope measurement: counting statistics and analytical precision

I. C. W. Fitzsimons1,*,{dagger}, B. Harte1 and R. M. Clark2

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Edinburgh, The Grant Institute, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK
2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia

* E-mail: ianf{at}lithos.curtin.edu.au

Analytical precision is vital in the interpretation of stable isotope data collected by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) given the small analysis volumes and the small magnitude of natural isotopic variations. The observed precision of a set of measurements is represented by the standard deviation (precision of an individual measurement) or the standard error of the mean (precision of the mean value). The SIMS data show both systematic variations with time and random Poisson variability, but the former largely cancel out when data for two different isotopes are expressed as a ratio. The precision of a SIMS isotope ratio routinely matches that predicted by Poisson counting statistics and can approach that of conventional bulk analysis techniques for counting times of several hours. All sample analyses must be calibrated for instrumental mass fractionation using SIMS analyses of a standard material. There is often a gradual drift in the mass fractionation with time, but this can be modelled by least-squares regression of the standard isotope ratios. Drift in the sample analyses is eliminated by using the relevant point on this regression line to calibrate each sample. The final precision of a corrected isotope ratio must take into account the scatter in both the sample and the standard data.

KEYWORDS: analytical precision, calibration, mass fractionation, Poisson counting statistics, secondary ion mass spectrometry, stable isotopes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mineral MagHome page
J. A. Craven, B. Harte, D. Fisher, and D. J. Schulze
Diffusion in diamond. I. Carbon isotope mapping of natural diamond
Mineralogical Magazine, August 4, 2009; 73(2): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
H. W. Kreuzer-Martin and K. H. Jarman
Stable Isotope Ratios and Forensic Analysis of Microorganisms
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 15, 2007; 73(12): 3896 - 3908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland