Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Compston, W. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Interpretations of SHRIMP and isotope dilution zircon ages for the geological time-scale: 1. The early Ordovician and late Cambrian

Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, A.C.T., Australia

^* E-mail: william.compston{at}anu.edu.au

Ion probe data for zircons from tuffs within the Llfynant flags (Arenig) and the Serw Formation (lower Llanvirn) of north Wales have been revised using better statistical methods for separating detrital ages, making allowance for recently-found variability in radiogenic ²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U in the reference zircon SL13, and testing the sensitivity of the ages to the secondary ion discrimination slope. The revised ages are options of 469.2 ± 2.1 () or 472.9 ± 2.9 Ma for the Llfynant flags dependent on mixture modelling, and 465.3 ± 1.4 Ma for the Serw Formation. All ages are within error of previous SHRIMP results and the Serw age now has the same numerical value as a previous MSID age for the same sample. It is shown that an MSID age of 483 ± 0.5 Ma with interpreted Pb loss for a late Tremadoc bentonite is dependent on the correction for common Pb, and that a slightly more radiogenic choice for the common Pb composition places nearly all data on Concordia. The latter would indicate that the bentonite might contain two zircon populations: inherited grains at 482 Ma and tuff magmatic grains at 473 Ma, which is more compatible with the SHRIMP Arenig result. Interpretations of other MSID zircon ages from the Ordovician are also sensitive to choice of common Pb, and raise the likelihood that many multigrain ages might be too old owing to admixture with slightly older inherited zircon. A supposed 1–2% technical bias of SHRIMP ²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U ages relative to MSID is refuted.

KEYWORDS: SHRIMP, isotope dilution zircon ages, geological time-scale, Ordovician, Cambrian

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Kaufmann, E. Trapp, K. Mezger, and K. Weddige Two new Emsian (Early Devonian) U-Pb zircon ages from volcanic rocks of the Rhenish Massif (Germany): implications for the Devonian time scale Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2005; 162(2): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Ireland, T. R. Ireland, and I. S. Williams Considerations in Zircon Geochronology by SIMS Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2003; 53(1): 215 - 241. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Bowring, S. A. Bowring, and M. D. Schmitz High-Precision U-Pb Zircon Geochronology and the Stratigraphic Record Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2003; 53(1): 305 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. F. Jenkins, R.J.F. Jenkins, J.A. Cooper, and W. Compston Age and biostratigraphy of Early Cambrian tuffs from SE Australia and southern China Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 2002; 159(6): 645 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Compston, W. COMPSTON, A. E. WRIGHT, and P. TOGHILL Dating the Late Precambrian volcanicity of England and Wales Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2002; 159(3): 323 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Compston Interpretation of SHRIMP and isotope dilution zircon ages for the Palaeozoic time-scale: II. Silurian to Devonian Mineralogical Magazine, December 1, 2000; 64(6): 1127 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Williams, P. F. Friend, and B. P. J. Williams A review of Devonian time scales: databases, construction and new data Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2000; 180(1): 1 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]