Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Mineralogical Magazine Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mineralogical Magazine; February 1997; v. 61; no. 1; p. 89-97
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagase, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kojima, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An SEM examination of the chalcopyrite disease texture and its genetic implications

Toshiro Nagase, and Shoji Kojima

Tohoku University, Institute of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Sendai, Japan

Back-scattered electron imaging with a scanning electron microscope was applied to the intimate association of fine chalcopyrite grains and sphalerite ("chalcopyrite disease") in synthesized products and natural specimens, in order to distinguish between diagnostic features of two formation mechanisms: replacement and coprecipitation. In the synthetic chalcopyrite disease in Fe-bearing sphalerite formed by a replacement reaction, chalcopyrite occurs as fine lamellae, which are also observed in relatively Fe-rich growth bands of the natural zoned sphalerite. Ellipsoidal to lens-like habits of chalcopyrite appear in sphalerite that has undergone extensive replacement reactions. These textures may have grown steadily from the lamellar chalcopyrite by consuming the FeS component dissolved in the sphalerite. All the sphalerite samples formed by the coprecipitation mechanism are Fe-poor, hosting triangular or irregularly bleb-like inclusions of chalcopyrite. This variety of chalcopyrite morphology could be attributed to diffusion rates and variations in fluid saturation, and their effect on the rate of crystal growth. Thus, in both replacement and coprecipitation the chalcopyrite habit depends strongly both on the FeS content of the host sphalerite and on kinetic factors, and is significant when interpreting chalcopyrite disease textures in natural samples.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland